Like Father, like son ... or in this case, like father like daughter. Does having a family on the wrong side of the law automatically make you guilty of their crime? Was it like that back in old west? How 'bout back in the old east? It's certainly not that like today, not much anyway. I'm surprised the town wanted to have Leta run out of town. I would have thought that since she was living in that town people would know that she was innocent. Most people can't hide the fact that they're up to no good, but I assumed what we saw of Leta, was who she really was. Sure she loved her father and brother, but she was quiet and naive and very young.
Doc Martin surprised me in the beginning with his attitude of not showing any sympathy for her. It seemed out of character for him. Off topic for a sentence, but those pills the doctor gave Ben for her were unlabeled in a vial. Is that how meds were dispensed back then? My how things have changed.
OK, back to The Outcast. How about the name Clay? Was that a popular name back in the 1800s? I mean Bonanza used it on a main guest star at least twice that I know of.
I liked how convincing Clay was towards the end when Leta wasn't wanting him to run and asked him over and over again if he killed Harvey Buford (The Chief). It wasn't until he said "Did you steal those shoes" that Leta realized she can't keep asking him that same question. As we all know, he did kill him and he was guilty of everything else. But should Leta not believe him? If not, she would be doing to Clay the same thing the townspeople were doing to her.
The end reminded me a bit of Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid where they were surrounded and thought for sure they were going to make it out alive. Even so much as planning for the future. Their future lasting about 2 minutes.
Anyway, good parts of The Outcast was, of course, Jack Lord! A young Jack Lord who would later become one of America's most handsome stars of the 1970's.
Do you think Clay loved Leta? What's your thoughts on the events in this episode?